Skip to main content

My prediction for the future of adoptions in/ from India - Part I

I just returned home after spending one month in training at National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child Development (NIPCCD) in New Delhi on a subject titled “Certificate course on Child Rights and Child Protection” where we have studied child rights and child protection extensively.

1. Legal basis:

There has not been a law as comprehensive as Juvenile & Justice Act (JJ Act) for the protection of children of India to date which gives adoption an important role as never before. Adoption is no longer an act of mercy but a mandated rehabilitative under the law (JJ Act) that a child must have a home as a first priority. Explanation of sub section (3) of Section 39 of the JJ Act states the following:

For the purposes of this section “restoration of and protection of a child” means restoration to –

(a) Parents;
(b) Adopted parents;
(c) Foster parents;
(d) Guardian;
(e) Fit person;
(f) Fit institution
.

One can see the importance that the law places for a child to have a home through adoption as it is placed right behind the biological parents. Also an entire section is allotted to talk about the adoption (Section 41 and Rule 33) in JJ Act.

JJ Act also has done something very interesting and that is sensing the difficulty of implementing the act. For this, they have incorporated civil society (a five member committee and a three member board) into it taking up statutory responsibilities to do the work and they are being paid honorarium for it. This civil society’s cooperation is envisaged to cover the entire length and breadth of the country.

2. Financial basis:

Government of India (GOI) has launched a scheme called “Integrated Child Protection Scheme” or ICPS to integrate and implement the JJ Act in its true spirit by not only integrating the civil society into it but also by providing the needed funds for it apart from building the needed checks and balances into it to make it accountable.

Adoption scenario that exists today (RIPA, LAPA and Shishu Greh) is about to go through a sea change where LAPA will be de-notified and there will only be two kinds namely RIPA and SAA (Specialized Adoption Agency) and they are to exist in each district (similar to a county in the US). Responsibility to launch ICPS is placed on the state governments and as soon as the scheme is launched, funds are disbursed from the federal government.

(To be continued.....)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

While surrendering a child (for adoption), child's biological parents requested that the child be allowed to follow their religion. How should CWC deal with such a request?

This request sounds silly because biological parents do not want the child, but they want the religion.  Child Welfare Committee (CWC) is duty bound to follow the JJ Act and its interpretation.  So, let’s take a look at the two different sections in the JJ Act to see how such a request can be handled. 

How do you deal with an unacceptable behavior of a child in a child care institution (CCI)?

Every entity would have their acceptable behaviors and not acceptable behaviors and the children's homes are no different.  JJ Act doesn't prescribe what is acceptable/ not acceptable behavior but expects the institution to orient and train the child of their rules (sub-rule (M)(1) of rule (69) of JJ rules 2016) Having said this, JJ rules (2016) do prescribe the possible specific actions, a child care institution can engage in, in case of violation of rule(s) that constitute to be 'unacceptable behavior'.  Sub rules (1) and (2) of rule N of JJ rules 2016 states the following: N. Manner of dealing with unacceptable behavior:-  (1) The action taken shall be commensurate with the nature and degree of violation and the age of the child and may be any of the following:  (i) formal warning;  (ii) assignment of house-keeping tasks;  (iii) imposition writing i.e. writing a number of times that he shall not repeat the behavior; an...